The European Union makes its packaging law the top rule for conflicting plastic cases.

From Aug. 12, beverage producers get clearer guidance when the 2025 regulation clashes with the 2019 directive.

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Share it!

The European Union has clarified that its newer packaging law takes precedence over the 2019 single-use plastics directive when the two rules conflict on certain single-use plastic packaging, a change that takes effect from Aug. 12 and gives food and drink companies a clearer compliance path.

The clarification appears in the consolidated text of Directive (EU) 2019/904, the bloc’s single-use plastics directive, as published through EUR-Lex, the European Union’s legal database. In that updated version, the relationship between the directive and Regulation (EU) 2025/40, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, is spelled out more clearly for packaging cases where the two texts overlap and point in different directions. In those situations, the newer regulation prevails.

That matters because the 2019 directive has been one of the main legal tools used by the EU to curb plastic waste from disposable products, while the packaging regulation has introduced a broader and more recent framework for packaging placed on the European market. Companies have been preparing for both sets of rules at the same time, and the boundary between them has been an area of concern for businesses that sell products in plastic formats.

For beverage producers, importers and distributors, the point is practical as much as legal. Wine, beer, spirits and soft-drink operators that still use some single-use plastic packaging, whether for the primary container or for other packaging elements around the product, need to know which law applies when they review labels, design, materials, supply contracts and market access across the 27-member bloc. A clearer order of precedence may reduce the risk of applying the wrong standard, facing enforcement action or having packaging withdrawn or delayed in the EU market.

The issue is especially relevant in a sector where packaging decisions are often made months in advance and can involve long supply chains that cross several countries. Beverage companies may work with separate suppliers for bottles, caps, sleeves, cartons, transit packaging and promotional packs. If one rule suggested a requirement under the older single-use plastics framework while the newer packaging regulation imposed a different approach, businesses needed certainty about which obligation should control.

The clarification does not mean the 2019 directive disappears. The single-use plastics directive remains a central part of EU environmental law and continues to cover a range of measures aimed at reducing litter and the environmental impact of disposable plastic items. Those measures have included product restrictions, consumption reduction rules, marking requirements and producer responsibility provisions, depending on the category of item. What the Aug. 12 update does is draw a sharper line for cases involving certain single-use plastic packaging that also falls under the newer packaging regulation.

That distinction is important because the legal instruments work differently. Directives set goals that member states must transpose into national law, which can leave room for some variation in implementation. Regulations apply directly across the EU. For businesses operating in several countries, that difference can affect how compliance is planned and audited. When a regulation is stated to prevail in case of conflict, it can give companies and national authorities a more uniform reference point.

The packaging and packaging waste regulation, adopted as Regulation (EU) 2025/40, is part of the EU’s broader push to cut waste, increase reuse and recyclability, and reshape packaging rules across consumer goods sectors. For the beverage trade, those changes have drawn close attention because packaging is tied not only to environmental policy but also to logistics, shelf life, branding and cost. Even where glass, aluminum or paper-based systems dominate, plastic often remains part of closures, wraps, labels, inserts or specific product lines aimed at convenience or travel.

In wine, the issue may be less about mainstream still wine in glass bottles and more about niche formats, event service, travel and lower-weight packaging solutions that have used plastic in some form. In beer and spirits, single-use plastic may appear in ready-to-drink formats, festival service, miniatures, gift sets or outer packaging components. Across the wider beverage business, any producer using plastic cups, pouches, sleeves, wraps or similar disposable packaging now has stronger grounds to review those products under the packaging regulation first when an overlap exists.

Law firms, trade groups and packaging consultants are likely to study the wording closely because companies do not just need broad policy signals. They need product-by-product answers. A producer may need to know whether a plastic component is treated primarily as packaging under the newer regulation, whether it remains subject to obligations under the older directive, or whether both texts apply in different ways without direct conflict. The new wording does not eliminate the need for that analysis, but it narrows one key question by saying which rule wins when there is a clash.

For national regulators, the update could also help enforcement. Authorities in different member states have been applying a growing body of EU packaging law as sustainability rules expand and deadlines approach. A clearer legal hierarchy can make inspections and compliance decisions more consistent, particularly in sectors such as beverages where products move quickly across borders and packaging is highly standardized. Importers shipping the same drink into several EU markets may welcome any move that reduces the chance of conflicting interpretations.

The timing is notable. Businesses are already working through a heavy regulatory agenda that includes packaging design changes, waste reduction targets and wider sustainability reporting demands. In that setting, legal certainty has commercial value. Packaging lines are costly to redesign, and mistakes can leave stock stranded or noncompliant. For smaller wineries, craft brewers and independent spirits producers with less in-house legal support, uncertainty can be especially difficult.

The updated EUR-Lex text does not read like a political announcement, but its effect could be meaningful for day-to-day decisions in the market. When companies assess whether a single-use plastic format can still be sold, altered or phased out, the first question is often not environmental ambition but which rulebook governs the item. As of Aug. 12, the EU’s answer is more direct for conflicting cases involving certain single-use plastic packaging: the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation comes first.

Liked the read? Share it with others!